S.TAMILVANAN
Dillibabu – Appellant
Versus
Arumainathan & Others – Respondent
1. This Civil Revisionhas been preferred against the Judgment and Decree, dated 112. 2008 made in R.C.A. No.2 of 2007 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority/Principal Sub-Judge, Chengalpattu, confirming the order and decretal order, dated 112. 2006 made in R.C.O.P. No.8 of 2000 on the file of the Rent Controller/District Munsif Court, Chengalpattu.
2. As per the impugned Judgment, dated 112. 2008 passed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority, order and decretal order, dated 112. 2006 made in R.C.O.P. No.8 of 2000 on the file of the Rent Controller was confirmed and the Petitioner herein, who was the Appellant in the R.C.A. was directed to quit and deliver the vacant possession of the Petition premises to the Respondent/Landlord, within a period of one month from the date of the order and accordingly, the Appeal was dismissed with costs. Aggrieved by the Judgment, the Petitioner herein has preferred the Revision.
3. It is an admitted fact that the Rent Control Original Petition in R.C.O.P. No. 8 of 2000 was filed by the Respondent/Landlord, against one S. Mohanraj and his brother Dillibabu, the Petitioner herein, seeking an order of eviction under Section
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.