M.VENUGOPAL
Gandhimathi Corporation, – Appellant
Versus
Pachamuthu (Deceased) & Others – Respondent
1. The Appellant/Plaintiff has preferred this appeal as against the Judgment dated 37. 2000 in O.S.No.116 of 1997 passed by the Learned Subordinate Judge, Attur, Salem District.
2. The Learned Subordinate Judge, Attur in his judgment dated 37. 2000 in O.S.No.116 of 1997 has among other things observed that a) the Appellant/Plaintiff has not proved that Ex.A.2, Pro-note dated 20.5.1988 has been supported by valuable consideration; b) on 25. 1988, the first respondent/first defendant and the third respondent/third defendant have not deposited the property title deeds with an intention to create an Equitable Mortgage; c) the Appellant/Plaintiff is not entitled to claim the interest of Rs.2/- p.m for Rs.100/- as prayed for by him; d) the suit filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff is barred by Limitation holding that the Appellant/Plaintiff is not entitled claim amount with costs and e) Ex.A.5, Memorandum of Deposit of Title Deeds dated 25. 1988 has not been registered and therefore the same is not accepted and resultantly, dismissed the suit.
3. Dissatisfied with the Judgment dated 37. 2000 in O.S.No.116 of 1997 passed by the Learned Subordinate Judge, Attur, the Appellant/Plaint
3. UNITED BANK OF INDIA LIMITED V. LEKHARAM SONARAM AND CO. AND OTHERS
8. A.S.RAMAKRISHNAN V. BANK OF BARODA
6. PENTALA GITHA VARDHANA RAO AND OTHERS VS. THE ANDHRA BANK LIMITED AND OTHERS
1. T.V.ALWAR V. BANK OF TAMIL NADU, THIRUNELVELI THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER
7. B.R.SHAMALA AND B.R.SHYAMALA DEVI AND ANOTHER VS. KUNDAN S.BHAYAANI AND OTHERS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.