SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 165

G.RAJASURIA
Mohammed Gani & Others – Appellant
Versus
Mohammed Gani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants:G. Sridharan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:K. Srinivasan, Advocate.

Judgment :

Prayer Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 20.06.1989 in O.S.No.76 of 1986 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Pudukkottai.

Challenging the judgment and decree dated 20.06.1989 in O.S.No.76 of 1986 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Pudukkottai, this appeal has been filed by the unsuccessful defendants.

2. The parties, for convenience sake, are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status before the trial Court.

3. Broadly but briefly, precisely but narratively, the case of the plaintiff as stood exposited from the plaint could be portrayed thus:

The properties described in the Schedule of the plaint and other properties originally belonged to the deceased N.M.Abdul Rahiman Rowther, the father of the plaintiff and the defendants 1 to 3. By a registered partition deed dated 011. 1963, the said original owner distributed his estate and allotted shares for himself and his sons born through his first wife and separately allotted a share nomenclatured as D Schedule to the plaintiff and the defendants jointly. The plaintiff and the defendants were minors at the relevant time of emergence of th












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top