S.J. Mukhopadhaya,J

As all these appeals have been preferred by the common appellant (S.V.Subramaniam) (who is the fourth defendant in the suit in C.S.No.517 of 2007) against the common order dated 17. 2007 passed in Application Nos.4144, 4145 and 4349 of 2007 and O.A.No.729 of 2007 in C.S.No.517 of 2007, they were heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.

2. The suit in C.S.No.517 of 2007 was preferred by the plaintiff (the first respondent herein) for the following relief:

(a) Declaration that order dated 8. 2006 modified by order dated 30.8.2006 and 38. 2006 in I.A.No.336 of 2006 in T.A.No.1 of 2004 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-2, Chennai, is null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs property described in Schedule A.

.(b) Declaration that Sale Certificate No.53 of 2006, dated 38. 2006 issued by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-2, Chennai, is null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs property described in Schedule A and

.(c) Permanent injunction restraining the fourth defendant, his men, agents, servants or assigns, from in any manner directly or indirectly acting upon the Sale Certificate No.53 of 2006, dated 38. 2006 issued by the Debt