SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 376

P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
A. Muthusamy – Appellant
Versus
G. Ayyappan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:M.M. Sundresh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S.A. Syed Haroon, Advocate.

Judgment :-

This appeal arises out of the judgment of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Erode acquitting the respondent herein, who stood the trial for an offence punishable under Section 138 r/w 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in C.C. No. 177/2000. The said case had been taken on file by the Trial Court based on a private complaint lodged by the appellant/complainant containing the following allegations:

"On 20.3.2000, the respondent herein/accused borrowed a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- from the appellant/complainant for his urgent expenses and for the discharge of the said debt, the respondent/accused issued a cheque dated 20.4.2000 drawn on Canara Bank, Park Road, Erode for a sum of Rs.2,50,000/-. He also made a promise to pay interest @ 24% per annum. When the cheque was presented for collection on 24. 2000, it was returned with the Bankers note "funds insufficient". Pursuant to the bouncing of the cheque, a lawyers notice was issued to the respondent/accused on 5. 2000. But, the registered cover containing the said notice was returned as "not claimed" on 15. 2000.

As the respondent/accused evaded service of notice, failed to issue any reply and did not make any payment for










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top