VASANTHAKUMAR, N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR
S. Muthuramu – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu & Another – Respondent
By consent of both sides, the writ petition itself was taken up for final disposal.
2. Prayer in the writ petition is to quash the order dated 20.8.2005, passed by the first respondent herein.
3. The brief facts necessary for disposal of the writ petition are as follows:
.(a) Petitioner started his service in the Revenue Department as Junior Assistant in the year 1972; got promoted as Assistant in the year 1975; further promoted as Deputy Tahsildar in the year 1984; as Tahsildar in the year 1993; as Deputy Collector in the year 1998; and as District Revenue Officer in the year 2001. When the writ petition was
.filed, he was serving at the Principal Civil Services Training Institute, Bavanisagar. He has put in totally 34 years of service.
.(b) When the petitioner was promoted to the post of Deputy Collector, he was posted as Additional Special Deputy Collector and at that time, the Sub Registrar, Arakkonam referred Document No.70 of 1998 under section 47-A(1) of the Indian Stamp Act. On receipt of the reference, petitioner took action as contemplated under Rule 4 of the Tamil Nadu Stamp (Prevention of Under-Valuation Instruments) Rules, 1968. On perusal of the docume
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.