Heard the arguments of Mr. S.M. Subramaniam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. M.T. Arunan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 and 3 and have perused the records.

2. In this writ petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 05. 2006 passed by the third respondent as well as the consequential order dated 06. 2006 passed by the fourth respondent and also seeks for a direction to the respondents for permitting the petitioner to complete his Ph.D. Course in the first respondent University.

3. The petitioner was working as a Scientist in the Central Institute for Research on Goats under the control of the second respondent. He submitted that his application to do his Ph.D. Course in Meat Science and Technology in the first respondent University. His application was duly forwarded and he wrote the Entrance Examination and got admission. Based upon the admission, he applied for study leave for undergoing the said course.

4. The petitioner was granted study leave by the respondents 2 and 3 vide order dated 110. 2005. It was stated that he should submit his six monthly reports of his progress at work and studies through his guide and he shou