SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 791

M.VENUGOPAL
Chandran Udayar – Appellant
Versus
Kasivel – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Thirugnanam, Advocate.
For the Respondent:N. Anbuchozhan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

The Civil Revision Petitioner / Respondent / Plaintiff has filed the present revision before this Court as against the judgment and decree dated 111. 2002 passed by the learned Appellate Authority viz., Principal District Judge, Villupuram in A.S.No.184/2001 in O.S.No.82/1999, on the file of learned First Additional District Munsif, Thirukoilur.

(2) The Revision Petitioner / Plaintiff has filed a suit in O.S.No.82/1999 on the file of the learned First Additional District Munsif, Thirukoilur against the Respondent / Appellant / Defendant for a recovery of a sum of Rs.24,610/- with interest thereto, along with costs, on the basis of execution of a Promissory Note dated 10.07.1996 by the Respondent / Defendant. After contest, the Trial Court passed the judgment dated 18.07.2001 in favour of the Revision Petitioner / Plaintiff.

(3) Aggrieved against the judgment dated 18.07.2001 passed by the learned Trial Court viz., learned First Additional District Munsif, Thirukoilur, in O.S.No.82/1999, Respondent / Defendant filed A.S.No.184/2001 on the file of learned Appellate Authority viz., Principal District Judge, Villupuram. The learned Appellate Authority viz., the Principal Dis
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top