S.TAMILVANAN
Kathirvelu – Appellant
Versus
Anbazhagan – Respondent
This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 25.08.1995 made in O.S.No.38 of 1993 on the file of the Sub Court, Chidambaram.
2. The appellant herein was the plaintiff in the suit before the trial court. According to the appellant, the respondent having borrowed a sum of Rs.35,000/- on 01.03.1991, executed the suit promissory note, Ex.A.1, agreeing to repay the said sum together with interest at 18% p.a. Subsequently, the amount was not repaid and thereby the loan was not discharged. Hence, the appellant filed the suit seeking a decree against the respondent directing him to pay a sum of Rs.47,100/-with interest on the principal amount Rs.35,000/-at 18% p.a. and also for the costs.
3. The respondent herein as defendant has submitted in his written statement that he had not borrowed any amount from the appellant and executed the suit promissory note, as alleged by the appellant. According to him, he was only a subscriber of Chit Fund (P) Ltd., Bhuvanagiri run by the appellant herein. Being a subscriber, he had taken money in the auction held and the dues were subsequently settled by him and that his wife, A.Vijaya had also joined as a subscriber in a chi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.