SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 1018

M.JEYAPAUL
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State, rep. by Inspector of Police – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:R. Sankara Subbu, Advocate.
For the Respondent: A. Saravanan, G.A.

JUDGMENT :-

Heard both sides.


2. This petition is filed seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings as against the petitioner, who has been ranked as A.1 in Crime No.1849 of 2007 on the file of the respondent police.

3. The sole allegation as against the petitioner is that he was found in possession of fake Passport and fake Indian Visa to travel to India. The respondent police having suspected the bona fides of the petitioner, chose to refer those two documents found in possession of the petitioner to the Chemical Examiner, who has returned a finding that as far as the Passport and Indian Visa alleged to have been found in possession of the petitioner are concerned, they are genuine. Of course, the Chemical Analysist has gone beyond the brief and stated that the New Zealand Visas are found to be suspicious, which will have to be confirmed from the New Zealand mission concerned.

4. We are not concerned with the fabrication or the forgery of any New Zealand Visas. The question is whether the petitioner possesses Indian Passport and Indian Visa for the purpose of entering into our land. It is only the look out of the New Zealand Government, as rightly pointed out by the learned
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top