SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 1053

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE F.M. IBRAHIM KALIFULLA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. CHANDRU
Union of India rep. by the Secretary to Government & Others
Versus
The Registrar & Others
W.P.13676 of 2003 and W.M.P.No.17155 of 2003
Decided on : 26-03-2008

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: A.S. Chakravarthy, SCCG.
For the Respondents:R2 & R3, Karthick Mukundan, Advocate.

Headnote:

Scientist B Promotion - Central Ground Water Board - Rule 6(2) and (3)

Fact of the Case:

The case concerns the promotion of respondents 2 and 3 from the post of Assistant Hydrogeologist to the post of Scientist B. The petitioners challenged the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, which directed the petitioners to grant promotion to the respondents to Scientist Grade B and subsequently to Grade C and D.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the promotion of Assistant Hydrogeologist to Scientist Grade B depended on the availability of vacancies in the Grade of Scientist B. The petitioners were directed to furnish details of the vacancy positions that existed between the years 1990 and 2001 and explain the non-holding of the DPC during that period.

Issues: The main issue was whether the non-holding of DPC for Scientist B post every year was detrimental to the interest of the respondents and whether the petitioners should be directed to accord promotion to Scientist B post from the year 1990 onwards.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the holding of the DPC for promotion from the post of Assistant Hydrogeologist to the post of Scientist B was dependent upon the availability of vacancies in the Grade of Scientist B. The petitioners were directed to furnish details of vacancy positions and explain the non-holding of the DPC during the relevant period.

Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of, and the matter was remitted back to the Central Administrative Tribunal for further consideration based on the details to be furnished by the petitioners. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

Judgment :-

F.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.

The Union of India represented by the Secretary to Government, Water Resources Department and the Central Ground Water Board along with the Union Public Service Commission are the petitioners. The challenge is to the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 30.09.2002 passed in O.A.No.419 of 2002. The issue concerns the promotion of respondents 2 and 3 from the post of Assistant Hydrogeologist to the post of Scientist B, viz., Junior Hydrogeologist.

2. The second and third respondents joined the post of Assistant Hydrogeologist in the year 1987 and 1988 respectively. As per the Rules, on completion of three years of service in the post of Assistant Hydrogeologist, they are entitled to be considered for promotion to the post of Scientist B namely Junior Hydrogeologist. The second and third respondents became eligible for being considered for Scientist B post in the year 1990. However, they were actually promoted to Scientist B post only in the year 2001. The grievance of the second and third respondents was that they ought to have been promoted to Scientist B post once they became eligible in the year 1990 and therefore, the petitioners should be directed to accord such promotion to Scientist B post from the year 1990 onwards. In support of the said claim, the second and third respondents placed reliance upon Rule 6 (2) and (3) of the Central Ground Water Board (Scientific Group A Post) Recruitment Rules 1987.

3. Rule 6 reads as under:

"6. Future Maintenance. (1) The method of recruitment, age limit, qualifications and other matters connected therewith shall be specified in columns 5 to 13 of the Schedule

(2) The assessment Board as specified in the Schedule to the various posts shall meet at least once a year and shall consider the cases of all departmental officers, who have rendered the requisite qualifying service. In the respective grade on the 1st January of the year following the year to which the departmental officers have become eligible for in situ promotion wherever applicable, to assess their suitability for promotion to the next higher grade.

(3) The system of flexible complementing and "in situ" promotions shall be followed in the matter of promotion of departmental officers in the grade of Scientist B Scientist C and Scientist D to the respective higher grades, namely, Scientist C and Scientist D subject to the following conditions, namely:-

(a) The total number of officers in the grades of Scientist D, shall not exceed 30% of the total number of posts in the grades of Scientist B Scientist C and Scientist D put together.

(b) The total number of officers taken together shall not exceed the total number of posts in the grades of Scientist B Scientist C and Scientist D at any given point of time but their shall be complete flexibility in the number of posts in relation to the respective grades.

(c) The departmental officers who have rendered in the respective grade the requisite regular service specified in column (11) of the Schedule may be recommended by the Board of Assessment comprising the officers specified in column (12) of the Schedule for promotion to the next higher grade. While evaluating the suitability of the officers for promotion, the Assessment Board shall take into consideration their qualifications, performance, merit and seniority. The selection shall be on basis of confidential reports and interview. However, the Assessment Board, may at their discretion, consider in absentia the candidature of such officer who is unable to present himself for the interview. The Assessment Board shall draw up a list of officers who are assessed as fit for promotion to the next higher grade. In so far as persons undergoing training in India or abroad (under F.R.51) are concerned, they shall be promoted to the next higher grade with effect from the date they would have been so promoted had they not proceeded on training subject to the following conditions being ful




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top