SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 4432

K.MOHAN RAM
B. Sekar & Others – Appellant
Versus
S. Latha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:N. Sudharsan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:R.G. Annamalai, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. The petitioners who are accused in C.C.No.124 of 2005 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Arakkonam, Vellore District, have filed the above Criminal Original Petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C., to quash all further proceedings in C.C.No.124 of 2005.

2. The brief facts which are necessary for disposal of the Criminal Original Petition are set out below:

The complainant/respondent herein is the first wife of the first petitioner; second petitioner is the father of the first petitioner and the third petitioner is alleged to be the second wife of the first petitioner. The respondent filed a Private Complaint against the petitioners herein alleging that the first petitioner has married the third petitioner in the presence of the second petitioner on 22. 2005 at Ramagiri Vaaleeswaran Temple, Andhra Pradesh State. On the basis of the said Complaint and the sworn statement of the respondent, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Arakkonam has taken cognizance of the Complaint for the offence punishable under Section 494, IPC. Being aggrieved by that the petitioners have filed above Criminal Original Petition.

3. Mr. N. Sudharsan, learned counsel for the petitioners














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top