M.VENUGOPAL
R. Indira – Appellant
Versus
S. Sathish Kumar – Respondent
1. The civil revision petitioner/respondent/wife has projected this civil revision petition as against the order dated 05.06.2008 made in I.A.No.13 of 2008 in H.M.O.P.No.43 of 2007 on the file of the Sub Judge, Mannargudi, in allowing the interlocutory application filed by the respondent/husband and thereby directing the revision petitioner/wife to appear before the Director, Institute for Mental Health, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010 for physical examination by a team of psychiatric specialists to be nominated by the Director, Institute for Mental Health, Kilpauk, Chennai and to give opinion and report in regard to the mental health condition of the wife/revision petitioner herein.
2. The trial Court, while passing the order in I.A.13 of 2008 in H.M.O.P.No.43 of 2007, among other things has observed by referring the revision petitioner/wife to the Institute for Mental Health, Kilpauk, Chennai for the purpose of examination and for report, would be a final and conclusive one and had resultantly allowed the application without costs.
.3. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner/wife contends that the revision petitioner/wife is in sound state of mind and that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.