K.MOHAN RAM
V. Loganathan – Appellant
Versus
Inspector of Police, Thirumangalam – Respondent
1. Admit. Mr. Hasan Mohamed Jinnah, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) taken notice for the respondent. With consent of the learned counsel on either side, the criminal original petition itself is taken up for final disposal.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner filed a complaint before the 1st respondent against respondents 2 and 3 alleging that the accused have forged certain documents and filed the same before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur in a suit for permanent injunction filed against the petitioner and the suit ended in dismissal; the accused had fabricated a lease agreement and produced the same in order to obtain an exparte order of injunction; therefore, the accused were charged under Sections 465, 467, 471, 473, 192, 193 and 196 IPC; the 1st respondent registered a case for the said offence in Crime No.1993 of 2002. But after completing the investigation, the 1st respondent referred the case as Civil in nature. On receipt of the RCS notice, the petitioner filed a protest petition before the XIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore. But the protest petition has been dismissed by the learned Magistrate
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.