SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 3597

V.DHANAPALAN
C. Raghupathy – Appellant
Versus
C. Govindan & Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:J.R.K. Bhavanantham, Advocate.
For the Respondents:G. Ethirajulu, M. Muruganandam, Advocates.

Judgment :-

Respondent had filed the suit O.S.No.1338 of 1997 on the file of District Munsif, Thiruvottriyur, against the petitioner for declaration of title, recovery of possession and consequential injunction in respect of the suit schedule property. The said suit was decreed ex parte on 19.01.1999. Thereafter, the petitioner filed I.A.No.646 of 2001 to condone the delay of 942 days in filing an application to set aside the ex parte decree. In the meantime, the respondent filed E.P.No.29 of 1999 for delivery of possession and obtained an ex parte order of delivery on 30.03.2000, pursuant to which the petitioner filed E.A.No.61 of 2001 to set aside the said ex parte order of delivery and E.A.No.24 of 2004 for appointment of Taluk Surveyor to find out the correct survey number of the property in possession of the petitioner; to locate the survey number 1174/3A2 and also to find out the person in actual possession. The Executing Court dismissed E.A.No.24 of 2004 on 212. 2005, against which the petitioner preferred C.R.P.NPD.No.993 of 2006 on the file of this Court and the same came to be dismissed.

2. Now, the order of dismissal, dated 212. 2005, passed in I.A.No.646 of 2001, refusi









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top