SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 3695

V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH
Kamala Devi – Appellant
Versus
T. P. Manoharan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ms. R.T. Shyamala, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Srinath Sridevan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the plaintiff against the order of dismissal dated 07.03.2008 passed by the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam in I.A.No.362 of 2007 in O.S. 52 of 2007 the application seeking for an order of re-issuance of Warrant of Commission to inspect the suit property and to measure the same with the assistance of a qualified surveyor.

2. The brief facts of the case put forth by the respective parties before the trial Court are as follows:-

.(a) The suit was filed for bare injunction in respect of the suit Old S.No.9/1 and New S.No.9/3 measuring an extent of 12 cents and the application in I.A.No.248 of 2007 was filed for interim injunction along with application in I.A.No.249 of 2007 for appointment of Advocate Commissioner. On 10.08.2007 Advocate Commissioner was appointed and taking advantage of the delay of 4 days in the appointment of the Advocate Commissioner, the defendant highhandedly removed the old compound wall which was found place in the ancient partition deed of the year 1929 and put up a new compound wall. The learned Advocate Commissioner has not fulfilled the purpose of the warrant and submitted his rep










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top