SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 3917

S.RAJESWARAN
K. Manickam – Appellant
Versus
K. Raja – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:S. Chandrabose, Anbumani, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The above Civil Revision Petitions are filed against the Orders dated 25.06.2008 passed in I.A.No.6076 of 2008 in O.S.No.1951 of 1997 and I.A.No.6077 of 2008 in O.S.No.5440 of 2000 on the file of the IV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

2. The second plaintiff in O.S.No.1951 of 1997, who is also the second plaintiff in O.S.No.5440 of 2000, is the revision petitioner in both the petitions.

3. O.S.No.1951 of 1997 was filed by the father of the second plaintiff against the respondent herein, who is also one of the sons of the father of the revision petitioner herein, for a mandatory injunction directing the defendant/ respondent herein, his wife and children, to hand over the possession of schedule B property occupied by the defendant with his wife and children under leave and licence granted by the plaintiff.

4. The case of the plaintiff in O.S.No.1951 of 1997 is that, the defendant/respondent herein is his own son and he is residing with his wife and children in a portion of the schedule A property and portion of the property occupied by the respondent herein is B schedule property.

5. According to the plaintiff/father, his two married sons, i.e., the respon















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top