SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 3798

M.VENUGOPAL
Neelambal & Others – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector & Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:D. Krishnakumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents: ----

Judgment :-

The civil revision petitioners/plaintiffs have filed this civil revision petition (C.R.P(PD) No. 3257 of 2008), aggrieved against the orders passed in I.A.No.161 of 2008 in O.S.No.454 of 2004 dated 12. 2008 by the District Munsif Court, Dharapuram in allowing the application filed under Order 8 Rule 9 of CPC.

2. The revision petitioners are the plaintiffs in the suit in O.S.No.454 of 2004 before the trial Court which has been filed for declaration that the suit properties belonged to the plaintiffs and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents etc from in any manner interfering with the suit properties.

3. The third defendant has filed a written statement and the same has been adopted by the defendants 1 and 2. However, the second defendant has also filed additional written statement before the trial Court. In the suit, on the side of plaintiffs, P.Ws 1 and 2 were examined and the plaintiffs side evidence was closed.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners informs this Court that D.W1 was examined in full and the matter is posted for further examination of Defendants witness before the trial Court. At that juncture,



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top