Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission and the learned Government Advocate.

.2. The writ petitioner was born to one Narayanasamy through his second wife and this fact is not in dispute. While the father of the petitioner was working as a Junior Assistant in the Public Works Department of the Government, in the first respondent, he died. Thereafter the petitioner was appointed on compassionate ground by the third respondent on 16.07.1997 as Typist on temporary basis. The petitioner joined the said post on 23.07.1997 and he has been in the said capacity for the past eleven years on temporary basis. The petitioner has made repeated representations for the purpose of regularization of his service and the same has not been considered by the respondents on the ground that the petitioner was not born to said Narayanasamy through his legally wedded wife. It is seen that the first and third respondents have written to the second respondent, the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, vide Letter (MS) No.34, dated 16.04.2002 seeking for a clarification as to whether the children born out of void marriage who