K.MOHAN RAM
Mrs. Kalavally – Appellant
Versus
Parthasarathy – Respondent
The petitioner in the above Criminal Revision is the accused in C.C.No.261 of 2004 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tiruvallur and the respondent herein is the complainant therein.
2. The petitioner faced trial for an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as Act) and he was found guilty and sentenced to undergo imprisonment till the rising of the Court and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/-in default to undergo S.I. for one month and further directed to pay a sum of Rs.3,29,000/-, being the cheque amount, as compensation to the complainant/respondent herein.
3. The case of the complainant/respondent herein is that the accused/petitioner herein was due Rs.3,29,000/- to the complainant in business transaction; when the respondent demanded the payment, the petitioner issued the cheque bearing No.743152, dated 3. 2004 drawn on Indian Overseas Bank, Nazarathpettai, Poonamallee for a sum of Rs.3,29,000/-; the cheque was presented for encashment on 13. 2004; the same was returned unpaid with the endorsement "excess arrangement" on 13. 2004; the respondent sent a legal notice, dated 23. 2004 to the petitioner; though n
8. Mallavarapu Kasivisweswara Rao V. Thadikonda Ramulu Firm & Others 2008(8) SCALE 680
11. Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
113. Kundan Lal Rallaram V. Custodian
3. Lakshmi Srinivas Savings & Chit Funds Syndicate Pvt. Ltd. Rep. By Its Present Foreman
7. Hiten P. Dalal V. Bratindranath Banerjee (2001) 6 Supreme Court Cases 16
10. Narender Singh & Anr. V. State of M.P.
12. Rajesh Ranjan Yadav @ Pappu Yadav v. CBI through its Director
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.