SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 3869

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K. SASIDHARAN
T.M. Kamalanathan
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Secretary to Social Welfare Department & Others
W.P.No.11766 of 1999
Decided On : 24-10-2008

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:V. Ajay Khose, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R1, R2, R5 and R6, P. Subramanian, AGP, R3 & R4, A. Selvendran, Advocate.

The State is liable for compensation when its machinery fails to protect citizens' lives and property, and political parties must uphold the Constitution and respect the laws of the land.

Headnote:

Mandamus - Compensation for Death by Electrocution - Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, Section 183, 321, 186 - State's Obligation to Protect Citizens - Liability of State in Case of Loss of Life - Political Party's Responsibility - Compensation Principles

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner's son died due to electrocution caused by decorative structures and lights put up for a government-organized conference. The petitioner sustained injuries and faced financial hardship due to the incident.

Finding of the Court:

The District Administration and Government officials were negligent in allowing the unsafe decorative structures and lights. The State has a legal obligation to protect citizens' lives and property. The political party's actions were in violation of the Constitution and regulatory laws. The State cannot evade liability for the loss of life and property caused by its machinery's failure to protect citizens.

Issues: Negligence of the District Administration and Government officials, State's obligation to protect citizens, Political party's responsibility, Compensation for loss of life and injury

Ratio Decidendi: The State is liable for compensation when its machinery fails to protect citizens' lives and property. Political parties must uphold the Constitution and respect the laws of the land. Compensation principles depend on the factual situation of each case.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition and directed the State to pay a total sum of Rs.2,10,000 as compensation to the petitioner for the death of his son and his own injuries.

Judgment :-

This writ petition has been preferred for issue of a writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to pay a sum of Rs.5 lakhs as compensation to the petitioner on account of the unfortunate death of his son by way of electrocution and to take both departmental and criminal action against respondents 2 to 6 for their negligence.

2. The factual matrix necessary for the disposal of the writ petition are as under:-

Petitioners case:-

The petitioner is a tea shop owner and his shop is located at No.79, Azad Road, Thorappadi, Vellore about 100 metres away from his house. The petitioner had one son and two daughters and he was maintaining the family with the meagre income derived from the tea shop. While so, the Tamil Nadu Noon Meals Employees State Conference was organised in Vellore under the leadership of Tmt.Indira Kumari, the then Minister for Social Welfare, Government of Tamil Nadu. All the preparatory and decorative works were started and carried out even ten days before the date of the convention. Since the Chief Minister was to be the Chief Guest of the said conference, organisers had arranged massive and festive decorations to felicitate her visit. They have put casuarina barricade on both sides of the road from Thorappadi to the venue of the conference at Vellore. They have also put up number of decorative arches, banners, paintings, boards, illuminary, flourecent and fancy decorative lights on both sides of the road. The organisers have also put up tube lights on casuarina poles for every ten feet on both sides of the road covering the entire stretch of the road from Thorappadi to Vellore. Further they have also pasted decorative colour papers on thin iron ropes/wires and tied them with the casuarina poles. All the lights were put on from the morning itself on 12. 1995 before the arrival of the then Chief Minister at Thorappadi by helicopter. Electricity supply for the lights were directly taken from the street lines and with the full connivance of the Government officials.

3. As scheduled, the Chief Minister arrived attended the function and after the conclusion of the meeting, the Chief Minister returned to Thorappadi by car and then proceeded to Chennai by helicopter. The Honouarble Chief Minister crossed the Azad road at about 5.00 p.m. and on hearing the noise of the helicopter, the only son of the petitioner by name Dinakaran, aged nine years, left the house and came towards the tea shop of the petitioner at Azad Road with an anxiety to see the then Chief Minister. The petitioners son entered the Azad Road and when he was just four shops away from the tea shop of the petitioner, the decorative colour papers pasted in iron rope/wire hanging from the casuarina pole obstructed and rolled down in his foot and he was pulled down on the floor with heavy shakes and shivering. The child cried and shouted for help and on hearing the noise, the petitioner rushed to the spot to rescue his son. When the petitioner tried to remove the iron wire rolled down in his sons foot believing that it was only an ordinary decorative iron wire, the petitioner experienced heavy electric shock and before realising that electricity was passing through the decorative iron wire, he was thrown away on the floor and became unconscious. He regained his consciousness only in Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore after four days of the incident and only thereafter the petitioner came to know as to what had really happened on 12. 1995 as well as the instantaneous death of his son in the said incident.

4. The petitioner was informed that his son was also taken to the Christian Medical College Hospital in a van by a Security Officer posted for the security of the then Chief Minister and after arrival at the hospital, the petitioners son was declared dead. The petitioner also sustained electric burn injuries in his right wrist, left arm, chest and scapular region and he was an inpatient in the hospital from 12. 1995 to 112. 1995. Subs













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top