SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 3147

P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
P. Joy Bell – Appellant
Versus
Thiru. V. Mahendran Inspector of Police – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ajmal Khan, Advocate.
For the Respondent: -

Judgment :-

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.

2. The petitioner has come forward with the present contempt petition praying that the respondent should be punished for willful disobedience of the order passed by this court on 21.01.2007 in Crl.O.P.No.19634 of 2006. The said Crl.O.P. had been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking a direction against the Inspector of Police, North Ideal Police Station, Vellore to register a case based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 011. 2005 and take action on the said complaint in accordance with law.

3. This court, by an elaborate order dated 24.01.2007 directed the Inspector of Police of the above said police station to register a case on the basis of the complaint of the petitioner dated 011. 2005. This court also issued a further direction to submit a final report as expeditiously as possible and more particularly, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order. Relying on the observations made by the Honble Supreme Court in Jacob Mathew vs. State of Punjab reported in 2005 SCC (Crl.) 1369), this court also observ





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top