High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. REGUPATHI
P. Ashok Kumar & Another
Versus
Inspector of Police, Crime, V3 J.J. Nagar Police Station, Chennai
Common Order in Crl.O.P. Nos.15451 and 15981 of 2008
Decided on : 21-08-2008
Abuse of Judicial Discretion - Criminal Procedure Code - Section 156(3), Section 200 - Central Bank of India vs. Ravindra and others (2001 (7) Scale 351) - G. Sagar Suri & another v. State of UP & Others (2000) 2 SCC 636) - R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab - Janata Dal v. H. S. Chowdhary & Others (1992) 4 SCC 305) - Indian Oil Corporation v. NEPC India Ltd. (2006) 6 SCC 736) - Roy V.D. v. State of Kerala (2000) 8 SCC 590
Fact of the Case:
The court observed a trend of Judicial Magistrates entertaining complaints relating to civil matters under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. and Section 200 Cr.P.C. for investigation, in collusion with financial institutions, leading to a large number of pending cases. The court also noted the illegal imputation of criminal flavor to civil disputes by the Magistrates.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Magistrates had abused their judicial discretion and power by entertaining civil matters as criminal cases, leading to a waste of valuable court time and a breach of established legal procedures. The court also highlighted the adverse impact of this practice on the judicial system and the need for the High Court to exercise its supervisory jurisdiction.
Issues: The issues included the abuse of judicial discretion, illegal imputation of criminal flavor to civil disputes, and the impact of this practice on the judicial system.
Ratio Decidendi: The court invoked its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and the supervisory jurisdiction under Sec.483 of the Code and Article 227 of the Constitution of India to withdraw and transfer the pending cases to the High Court for further proceedings. The court also directed the Director General of Police to take appropriate action against the Magistrates and instructed the police to obtain opinion from the Director General/Additional Director of prosecutions/Assistant Public Prosecutors.
Final Decision: The court issued directions to withdraw and transfer the pending cases to the High Court, stay further proceedings, and take appropriate departmental action against the Magistrates. It also directed the Director General of Police to instruct the police officers and Station House Officers to obtain opinion from the Director General/Additional Director of prosecutions/Assistant Public Prosecutors and file compliance reports within specified timelines.
Sensing the derailment of procedure established by law at the bottom level of the subordinate judiciary, in that, some Judicial Magistrates, in collusion with complainant Bankers/Financial Institutions, are in the habit of entertaining complaints relating to matters purely of civil nature and thereby, in abuse of judicial discretion and power, superabundantly passing orders under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. for investigation of such matters by the police for the undue benefit of the financial institutions, and in some instances they are entertaining similar complaints by themselves under Section 200 Cr.P.C., vigilance enquiries were conducted and reports received and the complaints entertained by them came to be quashed by orders of this Court passed in a number of petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In spite of such reaction by this court and repeated directions to the Judicial Magistrates not to refer the complaints/matters of civil nature for police investigation, recently, while dealing with like matters, it has come to light that such illegal trend is still widely in vogue. Since it was deeply felt that the issue relates to the propriety of the subordinate judiciary, by order dated 11.07.2008, the Registrar (Vigilance Cell), High Court, was directed to collect the details with reference to pendency of such cases before the Judicial Magistrate Courts in the State. Shouldered with the arduous task entrusted by this Court, the Registrar continued the job, however, he could not get the requisite particulars within the time stipulated in view of the reason that some of the Magistrates were reluctant to furnish the full-fledged details. Ultimately, subsequent to the strict direction of this Court, statistics and particulars from the courts of Metropolitan/Judicial Magistrates throughout the State could be procured. This Court places on record its deep appreciation for the erstwhile Registrar, Vigilance, and the present Registrar, Vigilance, High Court, Madras, and the Staff of the Vigilance Cell in accomplishing the task entrusted to them by putting in hard labour and almost working round the clock.
2. Annexure-A, B and C available in the vigilance report gives the particulars about the pending cases with regard to credit card transactions, personal loans, Hire Purchase Loans, cheque bouncing cases with IPC. offences etc., and the details of the Magistrates who have taken on file huge number of cases is furnished below:-
"ANNEXURE-A
Chennai
III Metropolitan Magistrate Court, George Town, Chennai : 10293
X Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai : 10738
XVII Metropolitan Magistrate Court , Saidapet, Chennai : 3159
XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai : 171 Total 24361
ANNEXURE-B Coimbatore Judicial Magistrate -III, Coimbatore : 243 ANNEXURE-C Ramanathapuram Judicial Magistrate Court, Paramakudi : 156 (Grand Total : 24760) " The particulars of the Banks/Financial Institutions at whose instance such cases have
been taken on file by the Metropolitan Magistrates at Chennai are available in the Vigilance Report and the same is quoted here-under, III Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai Pending Calendar Cases for the offences under Sections 406 and 420 of I.P.C X METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI Pending Calendar Cases for the offences under Sections 406 and 420 of I.P.C.
XVII METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, SAIDAPET, CHENNAI
Pending Calendar Cases for the offences under Sections 406 and 420 of I.P.C.
XVIII METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, SAIDAPET, CHENNAI
Pending Calendar Cases
3. As could be seen from the report, the huge number of the cases entertained by,
a) III Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai
b) X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai;
c) XVII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai;
d) XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai;
e) Judicial Magistrate-III, Coimbatore; and
f) Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi, Ramnad,
is quite ala
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.