K.RAVIRAJA PANDIAN, J.

As against the order dated 26. 2003 made in W.P.No.5367 of 1996, the present appeal is filed.

2. The respondent filed the said writ petition seeking for the relief of issuance of writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 11.02.1996 of the first appellant whereby the first appellant informed the respondent that the allowing of the retired Principal Thiru.N.Nanjayyan to continue in service after the extended period of one year i.e., after 31.05.1995 is impermissible in law and for the extended period from 01.06.1995 to 31. 1996 the respondent alone was responsible for payment of salary to the said Principal. The learned single Judge allowed the writ petition. The correctness of the same is put in issue in this appeal.

3. The material facts that are necessary for disposal of the appeal are as follows:

The respondent institution is an aided institution, being administered by a Trust through its Governing Council. The service conditions of its teaching staff including that of the Principal are governed by the Grant-in-Aid Code of the Tamil Nadu Technical Education Department. One Thiru Nanjayyan was working as the Principal of the respondent institut