These Civil Revision Petitions arise out of concurrent orders of eviction passed by the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority and concurrent orders rejecting the prayer of the tenant to deposit the rent into Court.

2. Learned Mr. P. Valliappan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. T.R. Rajaraman, learned counsel for the respondents.

.3. The respondents filed R.C.O.P.No.21 of 1997 on the file of the Rent Controller, Erode against the petitioner herein seeking eviction on the grounds of wilful default, owners occupation and demolition and reconstruction. Simultaneously, the petitioner herein filed a petition in R.C.O.P.No.23 of 1997 under Section 8(5) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1960, seeking permission to deposit the rents into Court. By a common order dated 7. 2004, the Rent Controller allowed the petition for eviction and dismissed the petition filed by the tenant for deposit of rent into Court.

4. The petitioner filed two appeals in R.C.A.Nos.5 of 2004 and 5 of 2005 against the common order passed in both the petitions. But the Appellate Authority dismissed the appeals by a common order dated 22. 2006. It is against