A.C.ARUMUGAPERUMAL ADITYAN
P. Vadivelu – Appellant
Versus
K. Thangaraj – Respondent
This appeal has been preferred by the Complainant under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act against the judgment in C.C.No.497 of 2000 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.1, Erode .
2. According to the complainant, the accused had borrowed a sum of Rs 3,00,000/-(Rupees three lakhs) Only on 7. 1999 to meet his business expenditure and had drawn a post dated cheque for Rs.3,00,000/-which on presentation before the Indian Overseas Bank, Erode, was dishonoured on the ground that there was no sufficient funds in the account of the accused to honour the same. A lawyers notice was sent by the complainant dated 12. 2000 demanding the cheque amount. There was a mistake crept in the notice dated 12. 2000 with regard to the cheque amount instead of mentioning the cheque amount was Rs.3,00,000/-mistakenly it was mentioned in the notice as Rs.30,000/- Hence a rejoinder notice was issued by the complainant dated 22. 2000. The said notice was received by the accused on 22. 2000 but no reply was sent by the accused. Hence the complaint.
3. The complaint was taken on file by the learned Judicial Magistrate, after taking cognizance of the same and after the accused appearing on
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.