M.JAICHANDREN
M. K. Santhi – Appellant
Versus
The District Employment Exchange Officer, Villupuram & Another – Respondent
1. The petitioner has stated that she had registered her name in the employment exchange, Cuddalore, on 30.12.1988. Subsequently, in the year 1991, she had renewed her registration. After the bifurcation of Villupuram District, the petitioners name was allotted to Villupuram Ramasamy Padaiyachiyar District. She had sent a letter, dated 11. 1995, for renewing her registration. Based on her registration, she was given a new registration No.15W/14632/93, and by an intimation, dated 12. 1995, the petitioner was directed to attend the interview in the aided school at Seshanganur and by an intimation, dated 26. 1995, she was directed to attend the interview in an aided school at Pombur. As the petitioner was not selected, she had informed the first respondent about the same.
2. The petitioner has further stated that based on the said intimation made by the petitioner, she was directed to appear in the office of the first respondent with all the necessary certificates, on or before 18. 1996. Thereafter, the petitioner did not receive any intimation. Later, she had found that intimations were given to some of the persons who had registered their names in the employment exchange
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.