R.BANUMATHI
M. Ranganathan – Appellant
Versus
M. Thulasi Naicker (Deceased) & Others – Respondent
1. This Second Appeal is directed against the judgment dated 15.07.1999 in A.S.No.41 of 1998 on the file of District Court, Vellore, reversing the judgment of trial court dated 25.09.1998 in O.S.No.313 of 1993 on the file of Sub-Court, Ranipet, and thereby, dismissing Plaintiffs suit for specific performance. Unsuccessful Plaintiff is the Appellant.
2.The Plaintiff and Defendant are brothers. There is no dispute that Defendant entered into an agreement of sale (Ex.A1) agreeing to sell the suit property to the Plaintiff for a consideration of Rs.1,75,000/-. On 012. 1991, the Defendant had received a sum of Rs.10,000/- as advance. Execution of Ex.A1-Sale Agreement and receiving of Rs.10,000/- as advance are admitted.
3.Case of Plaintiff is that he was always ready and willing to perform his part of the contract. But, the Defendant has been evading execution of sale deed under false pretext. Plaintiff issued Ex.A2 notice dated 30.08.1993, calling upon the Defendant to execute the sale deed as per Ex.A1. The Defendant had issued Ex.A3 reply by referring to a Panchayat and cancellation of suit agreement of sale. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance.
4
6. Parakunnan Veetill Josephs Son Mathew v. Nedubara Kuruvilas Son AIR 1987 SC 2328
7. Gobind Ram v. Gian Chand (2000) 7 SCC 548: AIR 2000 SC 3106
8. Indira Kaur (smt) V. Sheo Lal Kapoor 1988 (2) SCC 488
10. Chand Rani V. Kamal Rani 1993 (1) SCC 519
113. Jugraj singh Vs. Labh Singh AIR 1995 SC 945 (Para 3)
114. Krishnasamy Naidu Vs.Ambrose AIR 1996(1) MLJ 566
115. Sandhyarani Vs. Sudha Rani AIR 1978 SC 537
117. Satyanarayana Vs. Yelloji Rao AIR 1965 SC 1405
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.