SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Mad) 2237

K.MOHAN RAM
Naseer – Appellant
Versus
Balaji & Another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:C. Jagadish, Advocate.
For the Respondents: ---

Judgment :-

1. The above criminal original petitions have been filed by the accused in C.C.Nos.113 and 114 of 2007 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Chengalpattu, seeking to quash the proceedings therein.

2. The said cases were filed by the respective respondents under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The contention of the petitioner is that the place of residence of the complainants is Pondicherry, the place of residence of the petitioner/accused is Ramanathapuram, UTI Bank where the cheques have been drawn is situated at T.Nagar, Chennai and the Indian Overseas Bank, where the cheques have been presented for realization is situated at Thirupuvanai and as such the complaints ought to have been filed in any one of the Courts situated at the above said places, but the complaints have been filed before the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Chengalpattu, within whose territorial jurisdiction no cause of action has arisen. Since the Court situated at a place from where the legal notice has been issued will not be clothed with any territorial jurisdiction.

3. Mr. C. Jagadish, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner was heard on the above said contenti







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top