R.BANUMATHI
A. Muthusamy – Appellant
Versus
Muniammal – Respondent
1. This revision is preferred against the order dated 6.1.2005, passed in I.A. No. 401/2004 in unnumbered A.S.C.F.R. No. 14873/2004 on the file of the Principal District Court, Erode, dismissing the petition and declining to condone the delay of 477 days in representing the appeal. Defendant is the Revision Petitioner.
2. The Revision Petitioner/Defendant is the son of the first Respondent. Respondents 2 to 4 are the sisters of the Revision Petitioner. The suit was filed by the Respondent in O.S. No. 70/1997 for partition which was decreed on 15.7.2002. The Revision Petitioner preferred an Appeal on 11.4.2003, which was returned on 21.4.2003 and the case was not represented within the stipulated time.
3. TheRevision Petitioner has filed I.A. No. 401/2004 praying condonation of delay of 477 days in representing the appeal. According to the Revision Petitioner, he has been conducting business in several towns on commission basis and that he could not meet his counsel to give instructions in proceeding with the appeal. It is further stated that the Petitioner has been taking steps to settle the matter with his mother and sister but the settlement failed. When he met his coun
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.