SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Mad) 1963

D.MURUGESAN
Chockkappan – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr.K. Ravi Anantha Padmanabhan, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr.S.V. Duraisolaimalai, Government Advocate for Respondents 1 & 2.

Judgment :

1. Though W.P.M.P., seeking for stay is listed today, in view of limited question involved in the Writ Petition, by consent of both parties, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

2. The petitioners are co-owners of the property in S.F.No. 13/5 of Kattukuthakai Karisal Kulam Village, Kariapatty Taluk, Virudhunagar District, measuring about 2 acres. The petitioners were granted patta in the year 1984 during ryotwari settlement. While that be so, the 3rd respondent made an application for inclusion of her name in the said patta. By order dated 27.10.1995 the name of the 3rd respondent also included in the patta. This was questioned by the petitioners on 3.9.1997 before the Tahsildar, Aruppukottai. The petitioners were informed by the Tahsildar, Aruppukottai by order dated 25.10.1995, that if the petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 27.10.1995, they can prefer appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer. The appeal preferred by the petitioners was dismissed by the Revenue Divisional Officer by order dated 5.4.1999. The Review Petition filed by the petitioners before the District Revenue Officer was also dismissed by order dated 19.11.1999 with



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top