SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Mad) 965

P.SATHASIVAM
REDIFFUSION-DENTSU – Appellant
Versus
SOLIDAIRE INDIA LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties: Aiyar, Dolia N.Kalyanaraman, J.Nityanandam,
T.K.Bhaskar, Advocates.

Judgment :

P. SATHASIVAM, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONING creditor has filed the above Company Petition under section 433 (e) and (f) read with Sections 434 and 439 (1) (b) of the Companies Act, 1956 to wind up the respondent company.

( 2 ) THE case of the petitioner is briefly stated hereunder: The respondent is Solidaire India Limited, a company having an authorised share capital of Rs. 10 Crores consisting of 1 Crore equity shares of Rs. 10 each The issued, subscribed and paid-up capital of the respondent is Rs. 654. 26 Lakhs. The objects of the respondent company are to manufacture and sale of black and white and colour television Sets, manufacture of Sub-assemblies and electronic tuners, and marketing audio and video products, etc. The respondent appointed the petitioner by its letter dated 11-4-1994 as its exclusive advertising agency, pursuant to the said letter of appointment, the petitioner provided advertising services to the respondent including advertising in Newspapers, Television, radio, Creative Art Work, Film Production, market Research and Conference, etc. to the satisfaction of the respondent. In respect of advertising services rendered to the respondent between October, 1994














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top