1. Theplaintiff, who lost in both the Courts below is the appellant.

2. Thecase in brief is as follows:-The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration and for permanent injunction relating to the suit property. The plaintiff purchased house bearing door No.3-1-20 under a registered sale deed dated 23.6.1972 for Rs 1000 executed by Pankajam Ammal for herself and on behalf of minor son. He again purchased house No.24 under a registered sale deed dated 16.4.1975 for Rs.1500 from one Asalu Iyengar and Thiruvenkata Iyengar. The two properties were purchased out of his own earnings and both the properties were adjacent to one another. During 1976, the plaintiff demolished the two houses and constructed a single house bearing door No. 23, ward No 12 and assessment was also made in his name. The plaintiff came to know on 30.12.1977 the defendants 1 and 2 are trying to attach the schedule mentioned property in pursuance of an Arbitration Award obtained by the 2nd defendant against the 3rd defendant, who is the son of the plaintiff in connection with the alleged misappropriation of some amount in the Bank. The absolute property of the plaintiff cannot be attached for the alleged dues