SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Mad) 105

R.JAYASIMHA BABU
Allind Metal Fabricators Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Secretary to Government – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr.P.B. Balaji, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr.S.T.S. Murthy, Special Government Pleader for Respondent.

Judgment :

1. The Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act has been repealed by the repealing Act ( Act 20 of 1999) and all pending proceedings also having been declared to have abated. As held by the Supreme Court in the case of Angoori Devi v. State of U.P., JT 2000 Supp 1(SC) 295, a decision by a Constitution Bench, if the possession of the land had not been taken prior to the repeal, such possession cannot be taken thereafter and no proceedings can be thereafter initiated under the repealed enactment. During the pendency of this writ petition the petitioner had the benefit of an interim order protecting his possession. It is also not the case of the respondents that they have taken possession.

2. Thewrit petition is therefore allowed. The W.M.P. is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top