SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Mad) 458

A.S.VENKATACHALA MOORTHY
Sankaralingam – Appellant
Versus
V. Rahuraman – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr.S.Kamadevan, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr.V.Singan, Advocate for Respondent.

Judgment :

1. The above revision petition has been filed against the order dismissing an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, praying the Court to condone the delay of 371 days in filing the petition to set aside the ex parte decree.

2. The respondent as plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.926 of 1994 on the file of the Sub Court, Salem against the petitioners herein (as defendants 4 and 5) and three others (as defendants 1 to 3), praying the Court to grant a decree for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 15.10.1993 by receiving the balance balance of sale price of Rs. 12,000 and executing a sale deed in his favour in respect of the suit property and in default, the Court to execute the sale deed in his favour and for other reliefs. The suit O.S.No.926 of 1994 which was originally filed before the Sub Court, Salem was subsequently transferred to the Sub Court, Attur in the year 1997 (after constitution of Sub Court at Attur) and the suit was renumbered as O.S.No.366 of 1997.

3. Briefly it is the case of the respondent herein that he entered into an agreement with defendants 1 to 3 on 15.10.1993 in and by which they agreed to sell the suit properties fo











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top