SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Mad) 27

V.KANAGARAJ
P. RAMAKRISHNA PILIAI – Appellant
Versus
PALANIAMMAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:C.R.Prasanna, K.Subrahamanyam Reddy, Advocates.

Judgment :

V. KANAGARAJ, J.

( 1 ) SECOND Appeal no. 896 of 1996 is directed against the judgment and decree dated 25. 4. 1996 rendered in A. S. No. 70 of 1993 by the Court of II Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore thereby reversing the judgment and decree dated 16. 3. 1993 rendered in O. S. No. 899 of 1983 by the Court of III Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore.

( 2 ) THE other Second Appeal No. 897 of 1996 is directed against the decree and judgment dated 25. 4. 1996 rendered in A. S No. 83 of 1993 by the Court of II Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore thereby confirming the judgment and decree dated 16. 3. 1993 rendered in O. S. No. 3080 of 1981 by the Court of III Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore.

( 3 ) BOTH the parties have filed the suits against each other. The appellant in both the above appeals had filed the suit in O. S No. 3080 of 1981 against the respondents for declaration and injunction, while the first respondent in the said suit/Palaniammal had filed the other suit in O. S. No. 898 of 1983 against the appellant herein for declaration, possession and for mesne profits. The suit property involved in both the suits are one and the same. The trial Cou













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top