SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Mad) 258

P.D.DINAKARAN
Chellammal – Appellant
Versus
Meenakshi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Mr.V.Ayyadurai, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr.Lakshminarayanan, Advocate for Respondent.

Judgment :

1. The revision petitioner is the second defendant in O.S.No.39 of 2000 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Sivagangai, laid by the respondent/plaintiff for declaration of title of the respondent/plaintiff over the suit property and for consequential permanent injunction. After the examination of plaintiff witnesses, the revision petitioner/second defendant, through D.W.1 proposed to mark an unregistered release deed dated 18.5.1980 to substantiate his case and the same was objected by the respondent/plaintiff contending that the said unregistered release deed dated 18.5.1980 cannot be admitted as evidence as per Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act. Accepting the objection of the respondent/plaintiff the learned Principal District Munsif, Sivagangai, by his order dated 7.8.2001 refused to admit the release deed dated 18.5.1980 even for collateral purpose. Hence, the above revision.

2. Mr. V.Ayyadurai, learned counsel for the petitioner, placing reliance on the decision of this Court in Ayyavu and others v. Shanti Bibi and others, 2000 (1) L.W 466 as well as the decision of the Apex Court in Chilakuri Gangulappa v. Revenue Divisional Officer, Etc. & Anr., 2







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top