SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Mad) 907

V.S.SIRPURKAR, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
N. Sangeetha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Mr. S.T.S.Murthy, Special Government Advocate for Appellants. Mr. G.R.Swaminathan, Advocate for Respondents.

Judgment :-

F.M.Ibrahim Kalifulla. J.

1. The State is the Appellant herein. The challenge is to the order of the learned Single Judge dated 20.12.2001 in W.P.No.23181 of 2001, wherein, the learned Judge, directed the respondents to consider the representation of the writ petitioner dated 9.10.2001 and allot her a free seat for her in any one of the recognized Dental Colleges based on the observations made by the learned Judge in the earlier part of his order.

2. The brief facts are that the writ petitioner who belongs to Backward Class Community, secured the cut off marks of 286.01 in the centralized admission of candidates to the Medical professional courses in the Academic year 2001- 2002. The cut off marks in respect of Backward Class Community was stated to be 285.82 in the relevant year. In such circumstances, when the petitioner’s turn came for counselling on 4.8.2001, it appears that there was no free seat available and therefore, the petitioner opted fo r a payment seat for the dental course in the second respondent institution. Accordingly, necessary allotment order was issued to the petitioner on 10.8.2001. The petitioner also joined the said institution. However, due to









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top