SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Mad) 453

A.S.VENKATACHALA MOORTHY, K.GNANAPRAKASAM
M. Anandavalli Amma – Appellant
Versus
Arvind Eye Hospital – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:---
For the Respondent:----

Judgment :

A.S. Venkatachalamoorthy, J.

1. By a common Judgment, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Dindigul (Principal District Judge, Dindigul), disposed of M.C.O.P. Nos.1260/94, 55/95 and 56 of 1995 and other Claim Petitions on 28.02.1997.

2. C.M.A. No.1228 of 1997 has been filed by the claimants in M.C.O.P. No.1260 of 1994, claiming enhanced compensation over and above what has been awarded by the Tribunal. C.M.A. No.88 of 1998 has been filed by the claimant in M.C.O.P. No.55 of 1995, claiming enhanced compensation over and above the amount awarded by the Tribunal. C.M.A. No.327 of 1998 has been filed by the claimant in M.C.O.P. No.56 of 1995, claiming enhanced compensation. C.M.A. Nos.1331, 1337 and 1333 of 1998 have been filed by the Insured (owner of the vehicle), questioning the correctness of the Judgment of the Tribunal, exonerating the Insurance Company with reference to M.C.O.P. Nos.1260/94, 55/95 and 56/95 respectively.

3. Dr. Premachandran, Dr. Reshmi and Dr. Shanthi, working in Arvind Eye Hospital, Madurai, on the fateful day that was on 08.07.1994 at about 1.30 P.M., along with others, proceeded from Madurai in a Tempo Traveller Mini Van bearing Registration No.








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top