E.PADMANABHAN
Tirupathi Nadar – Appellant
Versus
Pakiyalakshmi – Respondent
1. This revision has been preferred being aggrieved by the fair and decretal order dated 9.7.1996 made in I.A.No.828 of 1996 in O.S.No.384 of 1991 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court at Ambasamudram. By the said order the Court below aismissed the application taken out by the petitioner herein for amendment of the written statement under O.6, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
2. This Court ordered notice of motion on 20.6.1997 and since then it is pending at the stage notice of motion. The respondents are yet to be served. The petitioners also had not chosen to serve the respondents 1 to 5. However, this Court with the consent of counsel for the petitioners took the revision itself for final disposal.
3. Heard Mr.T.Easwaradhas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.
4. The respondents herein instituted the suit O.S.No.384 of 1991 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ambasamudram seeking for the following reliefs:
(a) of permanent injunction to restrain the defendants, their agents and servants from in any manner interfering with the plaintiff’ s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the 1st schedule property;
(b) for a mandatory injunc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.