P.SATHASIVAM
D. Sarasu – Appellant
Versus
Jayalakshmi – Respondent
1. The plaintiff in O.S. No. 191 of 1997 on the file of Principle Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore is the petitioner in the above revision. She has filed the said suit for declaration of her title and injunction in respect of suit properties and in the alternative partition and separate possession of her share.
2. Thesecond defendant has filed a written statement disputing various averments made by the plaintiff. In the trial, during the examination of P.W.6 on the side of the plaintiff, the plaintiff wanted to mark xerox copy of partition list dated 14.07.1992. The said action was objected by the counsel for the defendants stating that marking of the same xerox copy which was objected when P.W.1 was examined and the said objection was sustained. Now again marking of the same document cannot be allowed and the xerox copy is not admissible. Accepting the objection raised by the defendants, the learned Principle Subordinate Judge, after holding that xerox copy cannot be marked and the claim of the plaintiff marking xerox copy of the document has been rejected, against which the plaintiff has filed the present revision.
3. Pursuant to the "Notice of Motion" ordered by this Court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.