SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Mad) 188

P.SATHASIVAM
S. Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
Balambal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr.P. Gopalan, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr.B. Ramamoorthy, Advocate for Respondent.

Judgment :

1. Aggrieved by the order in I.A.No,120 of 1998 in O.S.No.75 of 1996 dated 17.4.1998 on the file of District Munsif, Thiruvarur, the petitioner plaintiff has filed the above revision before this Court.

2. Thepetitioner-plaintiff by name Srinivasan through power agent has filed the above suit for recovery of plaint B schedule property from the defendants and for permanent injunction against the defendants/respondent; from in any manner interfering with the plaint 'B' schedule property. The plaint A' Schedule property is the whole property owned by plaintiff of which plaint 'B' schedule is a part. The suit ' B' schedule property is a lane measuring about 125 sq.ft. in T.S.No.166/1 No.2. Vijayapuram Vattam . It is the plaintiff’s case that this suit property was owned and enjoyed by the plaintiff and that the defendants while constructing their house in 1992 trespassed into plaint 'B' Schedule property despite objections and police complaints by the plaintiff and have erected concrete pillars and completely occupied it. The defendants have built a storeyed building. There are eves projecting from the plaintiff’s main wall (AB) to a length of about 9 inches for letting out r






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top