A.RAMAMURTHI
MRF Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
International Polymer Equipment – Respondent
1. The second defendant in C.S. No. 442 of 1997 has filed these applications under Order 14, Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Order 7, Rule 11 of Civil Procedure Code, Order 14, Rule 2 of Civil procedure Code, Order 14, Rule 5 of Civil Procedure Code and also read with Order 9, Rule 12 of Civil Procedure Code to reject the plaint as barred by law and as not disclosing any cause of action, to dispose of the suit on the preliminary issue of law and to postpone the settlement of the issues of fact after the settlement of issues of law, to strike out/amend the issues framed in. the suit on 3.12.98 and to direct the first respondent to make discovery on oath of all the documents in its power and possession relating to the claim for costs.
2. Thecase in brief for disposal of all these applications is as follows:
The first respondent has filed the suit against the applicant and the 2nd respondent for a declaration that the first respondent is not liable to pay the applicant any sum of money as alleged in the legal notice dated 15.9. 91 issued on behalf of the applicant, a sum of US dollars 62000 which is the cost already incurred by the 1st respondent in defending the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.