S.S.SUBRAMANI
Syed Mohamed – Appellant
Versus
Nabisath Beevi – Respondent
1. Plaintiffs in O.S. No. 60 of 1997 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Padmanabhapuram, are the revision petitioners. 2. Plaintiffs filed a suit for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants and their men from evicting the plaintiffs from the scheduled property and for other reliefs. It is their case that from the year 1980, they are residing in the scheduled property as absolute owners. First defendant is the sister of the 2nd plaintiff and, the 2nd defendant is her husband and they have no manner of right or title over the scheduled properly. While so on 8.3.1997, the defendants tried to evict the plaintiff from the scheduled property by force after making some false claim. Plaintiffs apprehend that the defendants may forcibly evict them and they have filed a suit for the reliefs stated above. 3. In the written statement, they denied the right of the plaintiff, but also filed a counter-claim that on the basis of their title, they are entitled to recover the property from the plaintiffs. According to them, 2nd plaintiff’s father had gifted the plaint schedule property in favour of the 1st defendant by a registered gift deed date
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.