2010 Supreme(Mad) 1843
Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.S. RAMANATHAN
A. Subramanian, Managing Trustee of Merit Educational Charitable Trust - Cum-Principal of Merit Matriculation School, Tirunelveli District
Versus
The Executive Officer, Tirunelveli District
W.P.(MD)No.10448 of 2007 & M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2007
Decided on: 20-04-2010
For the Petitioner:V. Meenakshisundaram, M. Vallinayagam, Advocates.
For the Respondent:M. Saravanakumar, Advocate.
Buildings used for educational purposes, including essential office buildings, are exempted from property tax under Section 83(1)(c) of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act.
Headnote:
Property Tax - Educational Institution - Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, Section 83(1)(c) - Section 81, 83 - The court discussed the provisions of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, particularly Section 83(1)(c) which exempts buildings used for educational purposes from property tax. The court also analyzed Section 81 which mandates property tax to be levied on all buildings unless exempted under the Act or any other law. The judgment clarified that the exemption under Section 83(1)(c) applies to all buildings used for educational purposes, including hostels and office buildings integral to the educational institution.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Managing Trustee of an unaided educational institution, challenged the demand notice for property tax issued by the respondent Municipality. The petitioner claimed exemption under Section 83(c) of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act for buildings used for educational purposes.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the buildings used for educational purposes, including hostels and essential office buildings, are exempted from property tax under Section 83(1)(c) of the Act. The court held that the respondent cannot levy property tax for the buildings used for educational purposes and quashed the impugned notices.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner's educational institution was entitled to exemption from property tax under Section 83(1)(c) of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the provisions of Section 83(1)(c) and Section 81 of the Act to clarify that all buildings used for educational purposes, including essential office buildings, are exempted from property tax. The court emphasized that the exemption applies to all buildings essential for imparting education.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the impugned notices for property tax were quashed. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the buildings used for educational purposes of the petitioner's institution are exempted from assessment of property tax.
Heard both sides.
2. The petitioner is the Managing Trustee of Merit Educational Charitable Trust cum Principal of Merit Matriculation School, Ambasamudram, Tirunelveli District. It is an unaided educational institution run by the said Trust and the Matriculation school is imparting education to 200 students studying in that school. The school has constructed buildings namely Block A to E and Door No.1 was allotted to the buildings and the respondent Municipality issued demand notice and the said notification, dated 05.10.2007 was issued for collecting the property tax for buildings owned by the petitioner's Institution and the same is challenged in this writ petition.
3. It is stated in the affidavit that the petitioner's Institution buildings are used for educational purpose and therefore, as per section 83(c) of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, such buildings are exempted from the property tax and hence, the respondent cannot levy any property tax for those buildings.
4. The respondent filed a counter stating that the petitioner is not entitled to claim any exemption and they are not imparting education as a Charitable Trust and they are collecting huge fees from the students and therefore, even though the school is run by the Trust, they are not entitled to claim exemption from property tax. It is further stated that the petitioner has not obtained permission from the Municipal Council for exemption of property tax for their buildings and therefore, they are liable to pay the property tax for the buildings owned by them.
5. Mr.V.Meenakshisundaram, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that under Section 83(1)(c) of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, exemption was given to buildings used for educational purpose, including hostel attached thereto and they are claiming exemption not on the basis of running a Charitable Trust, but on the basis of the buildings used for educational purposes and therefore, as per the above said provision, property tax cannot be levied in respect of buildings used for educational purpose.
6. Mr.M.Saravanakumar, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that in the Full Bench Judgment reported in 2009(8)MLJ 245, in the case of President, K.Vellakulam Panchayat, Kallikudi Chatram, Madurai District vs. Kamaraju College of Engineering and Technology Managing Board, rep. by its Secretary S.P.G.C. Srimurugan, Virudhungar. and in 2008(4) CTC 715, in the case of Kamalakshi Pandyurangan College of Pharmachy, rep. by its Secretary & Correspondent, R.Parimala Chandran, Ayyampalayam Village Post, Tiruvannamalai606 603 vs. The President, Ayyampalayam Village, Panchayat, Tiruvannamalai, this Court has held that there is no automatic exemption to the buildings used for educational purpose and that has to be decided by the Local Authorities and unless, exemption is granted by the local authorities, the buildings owned by the educational institutions are liable to be assessed for property tax and further, the petitioner is running educational institution as an un-aided institution and therefore, exemption cannot be claimed for such institution as laid down in the judgment reported in 2008(4) CTC 715, in the case of Kamalaksh Panddyurangan College of Pharmacy vs. The President, Ayyampalayam Village Panchayat.
7. Mr.V.Meenakisundaram, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner distinguished the Full Bench judgment reported in 2009(8)MLJ 245 in the case of President v. Kamaraj College of Engg & Technology Managing Board, rep. by its Secretary S.P.G.C. Srimurugan, Virudhungar and submitted that the Full Bench judgment was rendered with reference to the provision of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act and as per the provision of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, no exemption can be given for property tax, except in accordance with Rules and Rule 15(c) of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat speaks about the exemption to be given to the Educational Institution and the