PRABHA SRIDEVAN,J

1. The District Registrar, Madurai South, was faced with as many as Form-VII filed by the members of the 3rd respondent and returned all the Forms by the order dated 30.10.2008. This order was not attacked. But, instead, the 7th and 8th respondents herein, filed W.P.(MD)No.5528 of 2009 praying for a writ of mandamus for conduct of election for the period from 05.11.2008 to 2011 in respect of the 3rd respondent herein, namely Nadar Mahajana Sangam Kamaraj Polytechnic Paribalana Sabai ("Sabai" in short), along with a direction to the 2nd respondent parent Sangam, namely Nadar Mahajana Sangam ("Sangam" in short) to take charge of the administration of the 3rd respondent Sabai. The learned Single Judge held the election of the 7th respondent, the appellant herein, was invalid, set it aside, ordered fresh election and appointed an Advocate Commissioner to facilitate the election. Against this, the present appeal has been filed.

2. The 2nd respondent Sangam is a society registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act (in short "the Act"). The members of the Nadar Community all over India are eligible to become members of the Sangam. One of the educa