SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Mad) 3855

M.JAICHANDREN
A. Gnanambal – Appellant
Versus
C. Periyasamy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:S. Ramesh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:P. Valliappan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. This second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree, dated 15.3.2005, made in A.S.No.63 of 2003, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Kallakurichi, reversing the judgment and decree, dated 21.3.2003, made in O.S.No.271 of 1996, on the file of the III Additional District Munsif Court, Kallakurichi.

2. The plaintiff in the suit, in O.S.No.271 of 1996, is the appellant in the present second appeal. The defendant in the said suit is the respondent herein.

3. The suit, in O.S.No.170 of 1990, had been filed for a decree declaring the title of the plaintiff in respect of the suit property and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant and their men and agents from encroaching upon the suit property and in the alternative for recovery of possession and for mesne profits, and for costs.

4. The plaintiff had stated that the suit property and certain other properties had, originally, vested with the Government. The properties had been divided into house sites and the Government had issued patta to various persons. While allotting the plots, Plot No.38 had been allotted to Thandaan of Nainarpalayam. Since, the beneficiaries did not know about the plots wh


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top