SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Mad) 4315

ELIPE DHARMA RAO, D.HARIPARANTHAMAN
Sathya Foundations Private rep. by its Director, C. Sathya Samuel, C. Sathya Samuel and Mrs. Jancy Sathya – Appellant
Versus
Indbank Housing Limited rep. by its Company Secretary/Authorised Officer, Union of India (UOI) rep. by the Secretary to Government, Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs, (Banking Division), The Manager, Government of India Press and K. K. Th – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Satish Parasaran, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: Jayesh Dolia, Adv. for Aiyar and Dolia, Advs. for R.1, M. Ravindran, Addl. Solicitor General of India assisted by J. Ravindran, Asst. Solicitor General of India for R.2, M. Udhaya Bhanu, Adv. for R.3 and Narmada Sampath, Adv. for R.4

ORDER

Elipe Dharmarao, J.

1. The first petitioner company is a builder and with a view to develop a housing project in the lands measuring about 78 cents at S. No. 166/3B3, Kovilambakkam Panchayat, Tambaram Taluk, Chennai, the petitioners have approached the first respondent Bank and obtained a project loan of Rs. 40 lakhs on 12.8.1995 for the construction and as security for the loan, the land owners S. Lakshmanan and S. Ramachandran have deposited the title deeds of the property with the first respondent Bank. The project site has been named as 'Sathya Gardens' and the cost of the total project was Rs. 1.50 crores, even though it was shown as Rs. 88.34 lakhs in the loan proposal submitted to the first respondent Bank. Thereafter, as per the petitioners, since the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board sought to acquire the lands immediately abutting the land which was being developed by them, the proposed purchasers panicked and stopped making the payment towards the purchase of flats and hence the project came to a standstill. Since the petitioners failed to repay the loan amount, the first respondent Bank instituted a suit in C.S. No. 230 of 1998 on the original side of this Court, seek









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top