SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Mad) 782

G.RAMANUJAM
Velayudham Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Sandhosa Nadar – Respondent


Advocates:
Aiyar and Dolia, for Appellant.
S. Rajaram, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT.-

There two appeals arise out of a common judgment rendered by the Courts below in two suits filed by the same plaintiff, the appellant herein, against the defendants in each of the suits, seeking a declaration of title and injunction in respect of the properties covered by those suits. The property involved in O.S. No. 22 of 1966, out of which S.A. No. 1469 of 1969, arises in 94 cents in survey No. 335/1 and the property involved in O.S. No. 180 of 1966 out of which S.A.No. 1470 of 1960, arises is 5.47 acres, the western half of survey No. 333 measuring 10.94 acres. The plaintiff’s case is that the suit properties and the adjoining properties belonged to him ancestrally, that in any event, he has prescribed title to those properties by adverse possession, and that the defendants have no manner of right or interest in the same but they have chosen to interfere with his possession and enjoyment of the same.

2. The defendants in both the suits contended that the suit properties do not belong to the plaintiff, that they are the owners of the respective suit properties, that the plaintiff has never been in possession of the same, and that the plaintiff is not entitled to any of













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top