SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Mad) 333

S.GANESAN
Alagarswami Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
Lakshmi Ammal – Respondent


Advocates:
K. Alagumalai, for Appellant.
R. Rajagopala Iyer, for Respondent.

Judgment.-

Thiru Alagarswami Chettiar the husband has preferred this appeal against the order in C.M.A. No. 15 of 1968 on the file of the learned District Judge of Madurai.

2. Srimathi A. Lakshmi, the respondent herein is the wife of the appellant and she had filed O.P.No. 143 of 1961, out of Which the appeal arises, for a decree for divorce against the appellant under section 13(2)(i) and section 26 and 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 The respondent herein is admittedly the second wife of the appellant, and it is not disputed that the marriage between the parties took place before the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955, came into force and that, on the date of the application for divorce, the first wife of the appellant was admittedly living. Nor is it disputed that, by virtue of the provisions of section 13 (2) (i) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the respondent was entitled to present a petition for the dissolution of her marriage by a decree for divorce on the ground that the first wife of the appellant who had been married to the appellant before the commencement of the Act was alive at the time of the solomnization of the marriage of the respondent with the appellant.

3. The only que




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top